Kingang: We Have The Cudgel In 65 Attack
We Have The Cudgel In 65 Attack
14 Aug 2020 in 08:09am
I think that it would not be fair to have a true'single-way' but perhaps while letting 1 PKer assault at one 32, it would induce boss aggro on you. Hence the risk is still there, however, a bit minimized and allowing for more people to feel comfy with OSRS gold a bit more danger at those directors. Good post. Just continue wondering why wildy content continues to be lifeless and"lol" at a suggestion for more people out there. I am not afraid, I go for content. However I am not going to waste my time doing a boss for a solo player in a multi-combat zone. There is a reason Vetion & Calisto are pets -- nobody feels like exercising to wildy only for a group.
I hear you, but those two bosses arent as harmful as your portraying, both in its existing state are attainable in combat or by a place. Drops and the supervisors loot are such due to the extra risk you need to take. Attempting to modify its core place because you dont like the danger make a good deal of sense. The pets are uncommon for that reason alongside boss mechanics, same can be said about a lot of other non-wilderness pets.
I'm sorry you feel like that my buddy, I was loling at the idea of the mechanisms of that suggestion - would not you laugh at me if I suggested but for external the wilderness lets say at GWD so that I really could farm bandos for hundreds of hours without consuming 1 food. Merely to add to this fighting a boss in single way combat is abit tricky as you're practically protected from anyone attacking you, should you give up attacking the boss - someone could strike you then the exact same boss would agro them and you'd run away that doesn't make sense to me.
The thought of using such an item in GWD doesn't really seem akin. Like I mentioned at the post, the thing would need to be well thought out to avoid any difficulties. For instance, perhaps even though it makes multi zones effectively single-way, it buy 2107 runescape gold would still force the boss to smack you and let a PKer to keep assaulting you. A product such as this has the potential to revive this area by power dynamics involving a pvm and a team. This would also allow people feel more comfortable using risk, making pk'ing these directors nevertheless attractive.
I hear you, but those two bosses arent as harmful as your portraying, both in its existing state are attainable in combat or by a place. Drops and the supervisors loot are such due to the extra risk you need to take. Attempting to modify its core place because you dont like the danger make a good deal of sense. The pets are uncommon for that reason alongside boss mechanics, same can be said about a lot of other non-wilderness pets.
I'm sorry you feel like that my buddy, I was loling at the idea of the mechanisms of that suggestion - would not you laugh at me if I suggested but for external the wilderness lets say at GWD so that I really could farm bandos for hundreds of hours without consuming 1 food. Merely to add to this fighting a boss in single way combat is abit tricky as you're practically protected from anyone attacking you, should you give up attacking the boss - someone could strike you then the exact same boss would agro them and you'd run away that doesn't make sense to me.
The thought of using such an item in GWD doesn't really seem akin. Like I mentioned at the post, the thing would need to be well thought out to avoid any difficulties. For instance, perhaps even though it makes multi zones effectively single-way, it buy 2107 runescape gold would still force the boss to smack you and let a PKer to keep assaulting you. A product such as this has the potential to revive this area by power dynamics involving a pvm and a team. This would also allow people feel more comfortable using risk, making pk'ing these directors nevertheless attractive.
Kommentar hinzufugen