Kingang: Worse Compared To The Multi Ones
Worse Compared To The Multi Ones
23 Jul 2020 in 03:37am
Looks like they're coping with mechanics to me. They are choosing to tank the hit with harm reducing debil before the egg bombs go away and they are doing every other mechanic as it is. It's not like they are forcing a phase change by using familiar that is uncapped damage or blowing off freeing people. Even if they do the 1 mechanic they're opting to have a hit that's barely a mechanic which takes 5 seconds to clear and you wouldn't see it more than twice even in most of the time anyway. Can it be elitist of me to refuse to play with manners in league, or CS, or some other RuneScape gold game, with someone multiple ranks?
I personally have no issues playing other games in casual modes with gamers who are worse than me, and likewise in RS - when we're just doing some casual runs, or even better, if I am teaching, I do not care whatsoever about kill occasions. But if I'm trying to set a new personal record, or make a lot of money, yeah I'm likely to be strict on who I play. No doubt, there's a difference between"elitists" and"poisonous elitists", and some people certainly cross the line, but there's literally no reason that I can not deny to pvm with someone.
On artificial time gates, or more widely, the subject of hp caps - I hate it. Men and women whine about phase 2 or 4 in vorago? What about underside path (pre-update) in araxxor? Because they sense anti-skill time gating mechanics and HP caps are un-fun. Mechanic-based stalls, like the columns at lith, or reflects at vorago, feel much better.
Asking to be removed from RuneScape
The quantity of dev time needed to remove and correct content from the wilderness so you can add new content is far greater than simply developing a brand new place on RuneScape world to add that exact same content. You need a legitimate reason behind the wilderness should be deleted/replace, and all I'm seeing are for why your playstyle is significant suggestions. Then explain fixes or solutions aren't viable alternatives, if you want to point out flaws. Because the Wilderness/PvP is poorly designed RIGHT NOW, does not imply it can not be later on.
Just because Jagex chose a method of reviving it doesn't mean there are not real solutions that are viable that players/others have suggested. I'm not asking for a Wilderness Rework, I am only stating it shouldn't be removed.Most popular/active buy runescape 3 gold games are located around PvP or possess significant PvP scenes. The PvP audience is one of the largest audiences in gambling. Acting like Jagex should look to tap into that is silly. It may be hard and not really worth the resources/time to accomplish that RIGHT NOW but in the FUTURE it might be an alternative. Removing would hurt that endeavor that is eventual.
I personally have no issues playing other games in casual modes with gamers who are worse than me, and likewise in RS - when we're just doing some casual runs, or even better, if I am teaching, I do not care whatsoever about kill occasions. But if I'm trying to set a new personal record, or make a lot of money, yeah I'm likely to be strict on who I play. No doubt, there's a difference between"elitists" and"poisonous elitists", and some people certainly cross the line, but there's literally no reason that I can not deny to pvm with someone.
On artificial time gates, or more widely, the subject of hp caps - I hate it. Men and women whine about phase 2 or 4 in vorago? What about underside path (pre-update) in araxxor? Because they sense anti-skill time gating mechanics and HP caps are un-fun. Mechanic-based stalls, like the columns at lith, or reflects at vorago, feel much better.
Asking to be removed from RuneScape
The quantity of dev time needed to remove and correct content from the wilderness so you can add new content is far greater than simply developing a brand new place on RuneScape world to add that exact same content. You need a legitimate reason behind the wilderness should be deleted/replace, and all I'm seeing are for why your playstyle is significant suggestions. Then explain fixes or solutions aren't viable alternatives, if you want to point out flaws. Because the Wilderness/PvP is poorly designed RIGHT NOW, does not imply it can not be later on.
Just because Jagex chose a method of reviving it doesn't mean there are not real solutions that are viable that players/others have suggested. I'm not asking for a Wilderness Rework, I am only stating it shouldn't be removed.Most popular/active buy runescape 3 gold games are located around PvP or possess significant PvP scenes. The PvP audience is one of the largest audiences in gambling. Acting like Jagex should look to tap into that is silly. It may be hard and not really worth the resources/time to accomplish that RIGHT NOW but in the FUTURE it might be an alternative. Removing would hurt that endeavor that is eventual.
Kommentar hinzufugen