Mitglied Home
»
Benutzers Blogs
»
Nanlina's Blog
»
Contains robots for both matches also there are robots for OSRS than RS3
Nanlina: Contains robots for both matches also there are robots for OSRS than RS3
Contains robots for both matches also there are robots for OSRS than RS3
15 Mai 2020 in 04:07am
Clearly that is known by its from the winrsgold quarantine, everyone with a fraction of critical thinking. Stop being pessimistic. There are instances to be like"yeah but", this is not one of these. This is awesoms, as an OSRS lurker I am pleased to see you guys with this much RuneScape players, I bet that the worlds are packed and full of life. This fetish continues until the ending of quarantine.
Contains robots for both matches also there are robots for OSRS than RS3. It is probably true that more RuneScape players perform OSRS than RS3, but it is not just as much as the figures say. No, because if you had an specific count of the bots in RuneScape, you then would have to become a Jagex employee. And if you'd counted all of the robots in RuneScape and were a Jagex worker you investigate or would just ban them. However, go wander around in any F2P planet in OSRS.overrun with bots. You will find some at RS3, for certain, but not to OSRS's degree. Then you can't say that it's not quite as much as the figures state lol.I've played both games and I played RS3 far more and I can assure that the numbers are quite extreme of real RuneScape players between both games if we were to talk about our"feel" of gameplay using OSRS taking the lead.
"Probably". There is definitely legit RuneScape players at OSRS. It is always interesting when RS3 RuneScape players try to pretend that there is a possibility of OSRS being less popular. Even just taking a look at the Twitch/YouTube numbers gives you the answer. You are right, I probably should not have used"probably", because it's almost surely the case that OSRS has mroe RuneScape players than RS3, although there's technically no way to know for certain. All I'm saying is that the difference isn't as great as the playcount numbers would make it seem, since it's also"likely" true that there are much more robots on OSRS compared to RS3. And Twitch/YT numbers are not necessarily representative of true RuneScape players.Bear in mind that"they" that made RuneScape and"they" that implemented the grand exchange are two different groups of people. Firemaking is actually a lot closer to being balanced around DIY RuneScape gamers. The best XP rates come from purchasing logs, however you are able to train another skill (WCing) in high-ish efficacy (before crystallize anyways) and then get reasonable prices at FMing, or do all sorts of hybrid approaches (like curly roots). A pursuit gives both an unbelievable DIY level method. The skill is still XP rate virtually no matter what you can do, other than bonfiring low level logs. And there is no way to prevent those other than obtaining materials from RuneScape players.
As an ironman myself, I found that this occurred to some extent with all the mining and smithing rework. If you are training both together you wouldn't have ores that are sufficient to match your exp you are getting. The same goes for archeology - you also get some of the substances for the artifacts you are getting but maybe not them all. Additionally, hopefully they balanced it in order with the outfit, promotes and perks (or some other maximum efficiency methods) that you would be able to become self sustaining for substances.
I simply don't know why they despise taking surveys for RS3. It's like they're only trying to take care of RS3 different from OSRS for the interest of treating it distinct at this point.We did have polls at one point and it didn't go well. Everyone simply voted to make Slayer creatures and nothing else. Regardless of what the post states, Reddit surely has more of the hardcore RuneScape player base. When they left this into a vote, higher exp rates would almost certainly win.Its because there's a huge stigma around the surveys on osrs, ive spoke to many of the jmods and some wosh the surveys dodent exist as people vote without thinking some deeper about things that have set up, the surveys at this stage is simply a mob mentality wanting nothing new but also wanting new things, I whould love a couple ocational polls on rs but nothing to buy RS gold the amount of osrs.
Contains robots for both matches also there are robots for OSRS than RS3. It is probably true that more RuneScape players perform OSRS than RS3, but it is not just as much as the figures say. No, because if you had an specific count of the bots in RuneScape, you then would have to become a Jagex employee. And if you'd counted all of the robots in RuneScape and were a Jagex worker you investigate or would just ban them. However, go wander around in any F2P planet in OSRS.overrun with bots. You will find some at RS3, for certain, but not to OSRS's degree. Then you can't say that it's not quite as much as the figures state lol.I've played both games and I played RS3 far more and I can assure that the numbers are quite extreme of real RuneScape players between both games if we were to talk about our"feel" of gameplay using OSRS taking the lead.
"Probably". There is definitely legit RuneScape players at OSRS. It is always interesting when RS3 RuneScape players try to pretend that there is a possibility of OSRS being less popular. Even just taking a look at the Twitch/YouTube numbers gives you the answer. You are right, I probably should not have used"probably", because it's almost surely the case that OSRS has mroe RuneScape players than RS3, although there's technically no way to know for certain. All I'm saying is that the difference isn't as great as the playcount numbers would make it seem, since it's also"likely" true that there are much more robots on OSRS compared to RS3. And Twitch/YT numbers are not necessarily representative of true RuneScape players.Bear in mind that"they" that made RuneScape and"they" that implemented the grand exchange are two different groups of people. Firemaking is actually a lot closer to being balanced around DIY RuneScape gamers. The best XP rates come from purchasing logs, however you are able to train another skill (WCing) in high-ish efficacy (before crystallize anyways) and then get reasonable prices at FMing, or do all sorts of hybrid approaches (like curly roots). A pursuit gives both an unbelievable DIY level method. The skill is still XP rate virtually no matter what you can do, other than bonfiring low level logs. And there is no way to prevent those other than obtaining materials from RuneScape players.
As an ironman myself, I found that this occurred to some extent with all the mining and smithing rework. If you are training both together you wouldn't have ores that are sufficient to match your exp you are getting. The same goes for archeology - you also get some of the substances for the artifacts you are getting but maybe not them all. Additionally, hopefully they balanced it in order with the outfit, promotes and perks (or some other maximum efficiency methods) that you would be able to become self sustaining for substances.
I simply don't know why they despise taking surveys for RS3. It's like they're only trying to take care of RS3 different from OSRS for the interest of treating it distinct at this point.We did have polls at one point and it didn't go well. Everyone simply voted to make Slayer creatures and nothing else. Regardless of what the post states, Reddit surely has more of the hardcore RuneScape player base. When they left this into a vote, higher exp rates would almost certainly win.Its because there's a huge stigma around the surveys on osrs, ive spoke to many of the jmods and some wosh the surveys dodent exist as people vote without thinking some deeper about things that have set up, the surveys at this stage is simply a mob mentality wanting nothing new but also wanting new things, I whould love a couple ocational polls on rs but nothing to buy RS gold the amount of osrs.
Kommentar hinzufugen